On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 13:52 +0200, François Cami wrote: > All fine, except that we should maybe feel more than a little > concerned about release criteria wordered with *must* and not > *should*, when the dependency is a (rather large) piece of proprietary > software we have no control of and possibly no access to. A criterion which says "should" is effectively meaningless, if we're taking a strict RFC-ish interpretation of those terms. If it's not a requirement but a 'it would be nice', it's not a criterion. (I used to kinda let it ride, but I tried to tidy them up to basically always say 'must' in the F21 cleanup). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
