On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Aug 24, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Fedora will not become widely popular if it remains dangerous to install. > > At least it doesn't seem more dangerous than any other distribution, but I agree being trustworthy in this area makes it more likely people will install it. +1 >> Windows >> ======= >> (...) >> I propose the language be amended to the following: >> >> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an >> existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can >> boot into both Windows and Fedora." >> OS X >> ==== >> (...) >> "The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an >> existing clean OS X installation and install a bootloader which can boot >> into both OS X and Fedora, OR the installer must prominently warn the >> user that he may be unable to boot OS X after installation, allowing the >> user to cancel installation and reboot to OS X." All fine, except that we should maybe feel more than a little concerned about release criteria wordered with *must* and not *should*, when the dependency is a (rather large) piece of proprietary software we have no control of and possibly no access to. François -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
