On 08/06/2014 09:32 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> In Fedora 21 we've more or less dropped biosdevname in favour of >> systemd. systemd's system is a cleaner implementation and the weight of >> opinion favours the systemd approach to naming. See the discussion from >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965718#c76 onwards. >> >> From F21 onwards new Fedora installations should reliably result in the >> use of the systemd naming scheme. Existing installs that use biosdevname >> will continue to use it (with the same naming scheme, obviously) unless >> the admin intervenes. >> >> We should probably put this in the release notes. > > Currently, as I understand it, to get back the eth0 naming scheme, one has > remove biosdevname as well as add the net.ifnames=0. Does that mean that > with F21, we will no longer need the step of rpm -e biosdevname? > > The term "more or less" seems a bit unclear. > I'm looking at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Networking_Beat as well as the > bug report linked above, and from *that*, it looks as if it will no longer > be necessary for the rpm -e biosdevname step. > > Thanks > > Hmm, I have biosdevname installed (and always have) and have never put net.ifnames=0 anywhere that I'm aware of. I've used the syntax that I put thru earlier since F19 and I'm now on F22. Kevin -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
