Re: Consistent names changed yet again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/06/2014 09:32 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> In Fedora 21 we've more or less dropped biosdevname in favour of
>> systemd. systemd's system is a cleaner implementation and the weight of
>> opinion favours the systemd approach to naming. See the discussion from
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965718#c76 onwards.
>>
>> From F21 onwards new Fedora installations should reliably result in the
>> use of the systemd naming scheme. Existing installs that use biosdevname
>> will continue to use it (with the same naming scheme, obviously) unless
>> the admin intervenes.
>>
>> We should probably put this in the release notes.
> 
> Currently, as I understand it, to get back the eth0 naming scheme, one has
> remove biosdevname as well as add the net.ifnames=0.  Does that mean that 
> with F21, we will no longer need the step of rpm -e biosdevname?
> 
> The term "more or less" seems a bit unclear.  
> I'm looking at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Networking_Beat as well as the
> bug report linked above, and from *that*, it looks as if it will no longer
> be necessary for the rpm -e biosdevname step.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
Hmm, I have biosdevname installed (and always have) and have never put net.ifnames=0 anywhere that I'm aware of.  I've used the
syntax that I put thru earlier since F19 and I'm now on F22.

Kevin
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux