Re: Consistent names changed yet again?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 02:38:30PM +0200, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> In Fedora 21 we've more or less dropped biosdevname in favour of
> systemd. systemd's system is a cleaner implementation and the weight of
> opinion favours the systemd approach to naming. See the discussion from
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965718#c76 onwards.
> 
> From F21 onwards new Fedora installations should reliably result in the
> use of the systemd naming scheme. Existing installs that use biosdevname
> will continue to use it (with the same naming scheme, obviously) unless
> the admin intervenes.
> 
> We should probably put this in the release notes.

Currently, as I understand it, to get back the eth0 naming scheme, one has
remove biosdevname as well as add the net.ifnames=0.  Does that mean that 
with F21, we will no longer need the step of rpm -e biosdevname?

The term "more or less" seems a bit unclear.  
I'm looking at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Networking_Beat as well as the
bug report linked above, and from *that*, it looks as if it will no longer
be necessary for the rpm -e biosdevname step.

Thanks


-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux