On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:50:25 -0700 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 23:53 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote: > > On 07/10/2014 03:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs > > > > > > it was added back in 2013 - > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/116531.html > > > - to provide a documented process by which FESCo could designate > > > bugs as blocking the release. Practically, FESCo has always been > > > able to do this, but we didn't used to have a way of keeping > > > track of it. > > > > > > It occurs to me that there's really no reason for FESCo-designated > > > blockers to go through the review process: there's really nothing > > > to be discussed, if FESCo says "we designate this bug as a > > > blocker", then it's a blocker. We don't need to propose and > > > review it. So I suggest we should amend the Automatic Blockers > > > policy: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers > > > > > > with this additional bullet: > > > > > > * Bugs designated as release blockers by FESCo (see > > > [[{{FedoraVersion| > > > long|next}}_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs]]) > > > > > > does this make sense to you all? Thanks! > > > Makes sense. Make it so. > > Done, thanks Dan etc. for the feedback. Kevin, can you pass on to > FESCo that this change has been made, and if they decide to designate > a bug as a release blocker, they can give it the 'AcceptedBlocker' > whiteboard field immediately? Thanks. Done. Thanks. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
