On 07/10/2014 03:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs it was added back in 2013 - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/116531.html - to provide a documented process by which FESCo could designate bugs as blocking the release. Practically, FESCo has always been able to do this, but we didn't used to have a way of keeping track of it. It occurs to me that there's really no reason for FESCo-designated blockers to go through the review process: there's really nothing to be discussed, if FESCo says "we designate this bug as a blocker", then it's a blocker. We don't need to propose and review it. So I suggest we should amend the Automatic Blockers policy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers with this additional bullet: * Bugs designated as release blockers by FESCo (see [[{{FedoraVersion| long|next}}_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs]]) does this make sense to you all? Thanks!
Makes sense. Make it so. -- Dan Mossor, RHCSA Systems Engineer at Large Fedora QA Team | Fedora KDE SIG | Fedora Server SIG Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx San Antonio, Texas, USA -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
