On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 13:54:02 -0700 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks! So, we have this Alpha release criterion: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs > > it was added back in 2013 - > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-June/116531.html - > to provide a documented process by which FESCo could designate bugs as > blocking the release. Practically, FESCo has always been able to do > this, but we didn't used to have a way of keeping track of it. > > It occurs to me that there's really no reason for FESCo-designated > blockers to go through the review process: there's really nothing to > be discussed, if FESCo says "we designate this bug as a blocker", > then it's a blocker. We don't need to propose and review it. So I > suggest we should amend the Automatic Blockers policy: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers > > with this additional bullet: > > * Bugs designated as release blockers by FESCo (see [[{{FedoraVersion| > long|next}}_Alpha_Release_Criteria#FESCo_blocker_bugs]]) > > does this make sense to you all? Thanks! That makes sense to me. Plus, it saves us a few minutes during blocker meetings, which some days, we need :) // Mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
