-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed 28 May 2014 11:04:39 AM EDT, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:59:31AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>> I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process >>>> unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only >>>> benefit I can think of to separating them would be metrics, >>>> and I cannot measure the degree to which I don't care about >>>> metrics :) >>> I think we should care about metrics, and I think this would >>> be very useful to track, even though I agree it'd be better to >>> combine into one actual process at this point. >> I specifically meant "metrics about whether issues are specific >> to one Fedora release or another". I should probably start >> drinking coffee. > > Coffee is delicious. But even in a highly caffeinated state, I'm > curious why you don't think this specific thing is interesting. > Unless you are saying that it's immeasurable because you *care so > much*. :) > Mostly just that it seems like knowing which blockers came from which product is data for data's sake, rather than necessarily something from which we can take action. I *guess* we could use it to make resourcing decisions, if we actually had resources to distribute. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOF/fUACgkQeiVVYja6o6PoEwCdHts6HN8ee89BhZgWJ1uVf+yD I54An35Ap0io1+ughZPZrESa5Rz2HqHT =tzG5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
