Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/28/2014 10:11 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 08:11:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I'm of the opinion that we should keep the blocker process
>> unified until and unless that becomes impossible. The only
>> benefit I can think of to separating them would be metrics, and I
>> cannot measure the degree to which I don't care about metrics :)
> 
> I think we should care about metrics, and I think this would be
> very useful to track, even though I agree it'd be better to combine
> into one actual process at this point.
> 
> 
I specifically meant "metrics about whether issues are specific to one
Fedora release or another". I should probably start drinking coffee.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlOF+dMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PNfACeJ3aXX+JLc9AC9zisDeaU5KnH
EAYAn3nRkFpJnGyLpMoySeh5Yyxmz5Lk
=aucv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux