On 18.04.2014 06:30, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 23:51 +0200, poma wrote: > >>> or I suppose the other thing it could be is that some days the boot.iso >>> compose may fail, and I'm not sure in that case if an old one is kept >>> around or if it's just not present in the tree for that day. I'll check >>> with releng and see what I can do to make this better. thanks! >>> >> >> There is no need, thank you. >> I see the problem for the x86_64 is non-existent >> 'syslinux-extlinux-nonlinux, essential package. > > Yeah, so I talked to releng today, and we think this is more or less > what happened. The mirror redirect should make sure to only direct you > to a mirror where the /devel tree exists, so that's not likely the > problem. It's probably that there was a day when boot.iso compose > failed, so mirrors which were already up-to-date with that day's compose > would give you a 404, but mirrors which were still on the previous day's > compose would work. > > There isn't much we can do about that given how the composes are done, > so I've just added a note to the page (and the Rawhide page) explaining > that when boot.iso compose fails the links won't work, and you'll just > have to wait for another day or use a live image instead. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Rawhide#Nightly_images Thanks. poma -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
