On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:48:15AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 04:34:01PM +0100, Alexander Volovics wrote: > > But a lot of users are quite happy with 'fixed' solutions, > > especially on laptops, and might not like this unnecessary > > complication. And do not like or need LVM. > > Why do you care? (Not in a snarky way, but literally -- what is important > about this?) Is it hurting anything? > And if you _do_ care, does it really hurt to go into the advanced path? Because I like to keep things 'simple' if possible and LVM adds an extra structure to the disk layout that I won't ever use (or need). And no it doesn't hurt to go into the advanced path but why the extra work. I have been following the discussions on the different lists and know the rationale for the decision but as AdamW says in the reference you give: "It was manageable, because a plain ext4 layout is a fairly simple thing that isn't likely to break much". So it shouldn't add much to the QA burden or distract too much from the desire to keep things uniform across the 3 products. > Generally, this isn't really a test list discussion, except that the options > available have a big impact on testing. Please start with this earlier > thread: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2014-February/msg00012.html AV -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
