Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, March 17, 2014, 2:47:56 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What does everyone think? Thanks!
> Device tests:

> -PATA? They aren't made anymore, do we really need to distinguish
> between SATA and PATA? Is there a case where it worked on one but
> not the other? I'd think we'd sooner want SATA vs SAS, at least they use a different driver.

On ARM the majority will be MMC, with some SATA that may involve USB.
On PPC (secondary arch) SCSI is still quite important.




-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux