On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 10:25 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > On Monday, March 17, 2014, 4:14:50 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > I can't either, and even if I did, I don't think it would justify > > the result number explosion. Storage is storage, arch is usually completely irrelevant. > > > When we're at it, why do we have both i686 and x86_64 at "Device > > tests"? A single results column for x86 should be enough. Same reasoning. > > In the past, some filesystems have had issues handling 64-bit inodes > in 32-bit architectures. User data is too important to make an > assumption that these no longer will occur. Device tests are not filesystem tests, though. Could you provide some references to these issues? With either set of tests, though, I don't see that any 'user data' is involved: in each case the only partitions we're creating or touching are new ones with no user data involved. Even if one of the filesystems we create might suffer from a bug further down the line, I don't think any of these tests would catch it, would they? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
