----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexander Todorov" <atodorov@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases" <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Alexander Kurtakov" <akurtakov@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora" > <packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:56:43 PM > Subject: Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check > > На 27.02.2014 21:31, Aleksandar Kurtakov написа: > > I have similar feelings as ajax. It's not whether it's useless of treasure. > > If someone says "give me commit rights as I want to make tests build|fix > > url|fix formatting|improve BRs|etc. in package A you're maintainer" I > > would be more than happy to welcome him/her as co-maintainer but just > > showing me such things as something to be improved is not something that I > > would hurry to even look at as I'm aware of way more problems that affect > > even runtime behaviour of the package and until these more important > > things get fixed the rest is smth that the one identifing should come with > > a fix otherwise it will stay for the bright future when we have endless > > time and resources. > > > > So you mean somewhere around Fedora 100 when we enter the Singularity :). Or even 1000 :). Whenever people start fixing the problems is the right answer. "Talk is cheap, show me the code." The time spent on these discussions could have ended in 10+ fixed packages if summed. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team > > > > >>>> On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote: > >>>> ... > >>>>>> Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to > >>>>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Oh yes, another useless rpm feature, I'll be sure to make that my top > >>>>> priority. > >>>> > > > Indeed I run a small test and from 2574 RPMs on the source DVD there is > around > 40% of "something different than HTTP 200 OK". > > The majority (30%) are responses in the 3XX range and only less than 10% are > actual errors (4XX, 5XX, missing URLs or connection errors). > > > I'm not sure what purpose does the URL field serve nowadays but it looks like > it > can be removed from the spec file (and RPM for that matter)! > > > -- > Alex > > > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
