On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 01:43:30PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I don't know how broadly "QA context" goes here. If "handling of all bugs > > and their lifecycle" is QA, then probably yes. But I don't have anything new > > or surprising over what I've already said on the devel list. I'm just happy > > to talk about it whenever/wherever. As long as I am awake. :) > I don't think that would be a QA meeting topic exactly, no - the EOL > process isn't 'owned' by QA. As it affects multiple groups, major > changes to EOL probably need to go through FESCo or some kind of ad-hoc > meeting of 'involved' parties (at least QA and devel). Okay, so, I'm asking the bugzilla people if CLOSED:EOL is even a reasonable possibility. And then let's take it back to https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1198 -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
