On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 04:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:00:39AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I feel strongly about it, but I'll be traveling all day. > > In a QA context? If it's something there'd be value to discussing in a > > QA context, we could schedule a meeting later in the week... > > I don't know how broadly "QA context" goes here. If "handling of all bugs > and their lifecycle" is QA, then probably yes. But I don't have anything new > or surprising over what I've already said on the devel list. I'm just happy > to talk about it whenever/wherever. As long as I am awake. :) I don't think that would be a QA meeting topic exactly, no - the EOL process isn't 'owned' by QA. As it affects multiple groups, major changes to EOL probably need to go through FESCo or some kind of ad-hoc meeting of 'involved' parties (at least QA and devel). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
