On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 19:10 +0100, A.J. Werkman wrote: > On 12/09/2013 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:08:51 +0100 > > "A.J. Werkman" <AJ.Werkman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Adam, > >> > >> You asked people to test F20 with IPv6. I do agree that works fine. > >> But the problems I see is getting F20 installed IPv6 only. > >> > >> In my experience as soon as you involve IPv4 somehow, things work. > >> > >> My testcase is a IPv6 only network, without IPv4-DHCP. Wether you > >> supply IPv6 address on the boot command line or you supply addresses > >> in the opening network screen after boot, F20 crashes. > >> Even kickstarting with installation from local media makes F20 crash. > > I agree that it would be good to support this case... but I'm not sure > > we have any specific 'ipv6 only' test cases/criteria, so it's not been > > something on the radar much... > > > > Perhaps something to propose for next release? > > > > kevin > +1 for me. I proposed this some time ago. At that point there was not > much enthousiasme for it. But if Fedora wants to be, as it always > claims, on the cutting edge, you should have IPv6-only in QA. > > One thing you would immediatly run into is the fact that > bugzilla.redhat.com does not resolve to an IPv6 address. So sending > crash reports from anaconda isn't possible at the moment from IPv6. Instead of proposing that somebody writes a test case, perhaps write a test case and propose that? It's generally going to get you to your goal faster. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
