On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 18:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 01:35 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few > > > days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases. > > > Here's the first: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_network_smb > > > > wiki says: "Attempt to browse SMB shares on the local network with the > > desktop's normal method for doing so. For GNOME, open Files, click > > Browse Network under Network in the left-hand pane, and double-click > > Windows Network. For KDE, open Dolphin, click Network under Places in > > the left-hand pane, and expand or click on Samba Shares" > > > > I don't believe :) that you don't include in this test smb4k, I'm the > > maintainer of it . Can I include it ? smb4k (smb for kde) is much better > > browser, IMO, that kde network of dolphin and have more options etc. > > It's not about what's the best tool: it's a desktop polish test case. > The point is to answer the question 'does this fairly commonly used > function work right out of the box?' So testing with smb4k would be > outside the scope of this test. > > What would make sense would be to write a separate test for smb4k. Or, > heck, a whole set of test cases! We've been wanting to have more test > cases for more applications for a long time. But it wouldn't make sense > as a 'desktop validation' test unless smb4k comes installed out of the > box and Fedora users are all used to using that, not Dolphin, to browse > SMB shares. What you mean with "comes installed out of the box" ? , should be install , I not mean that is , as default in KDE-desktop, it is a great tool, you mean be default or yum install smb4k is enough ? > If you do write one or more test cases for smb4k, add this to the > bottom: > > [[Category:Package_smb4k_test_cases]] > > and then when you send out an update for the smb4k package, the test > cases will be listed in Bodhi as good tests to run to test the > update. :) Many thanks for this tips , I will read carefully and take action, but don't know when, I'm pretty busy > > > it's a test case for browsing SMB shares. Note that I'm fairly sure it's > > > currently broken if you have firewalld enabled, even if you allow the > > > 'samba-client' service; I have a bug reported at > > > https://bugzilla.redha.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038959 where we're trying to > > > figure out why. > > > > I will try do the test case with the smb4k ... > > It's broken at a much lower level, it's something firewalld is doing > wrong I believe. With smb4k you can change the defaults, and choose other kind of authentications, for example I need an old authentication to access a NAS server with a old Samba (which can't change it). I will try debug it :) but perhaps just can do the tests Monday afternoon . Many thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
