On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 01:35 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sex, 2013-12-06 at 15:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi, folks. I've been doing some polish testing on F20 in the last few > > days, and thought it'd make sense to write up my tests as test cases. > > Here's the first: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_network_smb > > wiki says: "Attempt to browse SMB shares on the local network with the > desktop's normal method for doing so. For GNOME, open Files, click > Browse Network under Network in the left-hand pane, and double-click > Windows Network. For KDE, open Dolphin, click Network under Places in > the left-hand pane, and expand or click on Samba Shares" > > I don't believe :) that you don't include in this test smb4k, I'm the > maintainer of it . Can I include it ? smb4k (smb for kde) is much better > browser, IMO, that kde network of dolphin and have more options etc. It's not about what's the best tool: it's a desktop polish test case. The point is to answer the question 'does this fairly commonly used function work right out of the box?' So testing with smb4k would be outside the scope of this test. What would make sense would be to write a separate test for smb4k. Or, heck, a whole set of test cases! We've been wanting to have more test cases for more applications for a long time. But it wouldn't make sense as a 'desktop validation' test unless smb4k comes installed out of the box and Fedora users are all used to using that, not Dolphin, to browse SMB shares. If you do write one or more test cases for smb4k, add this to the bottom: [[Category:Package_smb4k_test_cases]] and then when you send out an update for the smb4k package, the test cases will be listed in Bodhi as good tests to run to test the update. :) > > it's a test case for browsing SMB shares. Note that I'm fairly sure it's > > currently broken if you have firewalld enabled, even if you allow the > > 'samba-client' service; I have a bug reported at > > https://bugzilla.redha.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038959 where we're trying to > > figure out why. > > I will try do the test case with the smb4k ... It's broken at a much lower level, it's something firewalld is doing wrong I believe. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
