On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 15:28 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > All of the above is fine. However, your are exhibiting profound > arrogance in stepping in for real fedora managers/developers. Do your > RFEs and your own bzs, but, leave other peoples bz reports alone. You are assuming a policy that does not exist. I don't believe there is any rule or policy which Chris' closure of your bug violated. As someone said upthread, Fedora is intentionally not hedged around with *too* many hard and fast rules. There are various statuses in FAS which translate into 'editbugs' privileges - which allow you to close others' bugs - and it's generally not considered a problem for people with editbugs privileges to do something like this. If Chris' change had actually been completely wrong, that might have been a problem, and the appropriate thing to do would be to reverse it, and then keep an eye out to make sure he wasn't repeatedly doing silly things, or just trolling, or something. At the point where someone exhibits a pattern of bad behaviour, then is the time when we get together as a group and say 'hmm, maybe something should be done about this'. But no, there is no rule that says 'Chris can't close a bug Clyde filed against anaconda'. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
