On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 13:35 -0500, Richard Michael wrote: > >> Aside, I'm wondering if F20 should have already created a bridge for >> libvirt (e.g., should I need to create it myself?). I selected the >> 'Virtualization' group. Perhaps this is related to Chris' down-thread >> comment that not all required packages are in the group? > > No, AIUI, it does not and would never do that out of the box: it > wouldn't really be appropriate for a package to go around screwing with > your network config to that extent. It is not safe to assume anyone > setting up 'virtualization' wants bridged networking; people who just > want to use virt-manager as a VirtualBox-alike are probably happy with > NATed networking. Yes, agreed ; although -- My installation did was missing the default local NAT network. Reading the libvirt.org wiki just now, this should be "out of the box". I followed the instructions to create it and get NAT working. Does the Fedora team expect this default network to be created? If yes, I wonder if: a/ there is a missing a package from the "Virtualization" group (probably not, given remarks elsewhere in the thread) or b/ a post-install script failure from an installed package failed to import the default.xml file to initialize the virtual network Aside, I don't want to hijack the Fedora test list for libvirt/virt-manager issues. Should I move this to another list? Regards, Richard > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
