Adam Williamson <awilliam <at> redhat.com> writes: > > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 03:23 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote: > > The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT identical. The > > checksums are different, and just looking at the DVD, the options under > > "Installation source" are different (RC3 only had one option, RC4 has the > > regular complement) and the add-ons for "Basic desktop" are different (RC3 > > had Security Lab, which normally isn't there, RC4 does not). There are > > probably other differences as well, I didn't check thoroughly. It looks like > > something was broken with RC3 install images and fixed with RC4. > > Sounds like it was affected by the kickstart bug too, then. We didn't > change package loadout at all between RC3 and RC4. False alarm. AFAICT, the only actual difference is in the checksums. I think the add-ons difference was due to looking at a netinst vs. a DVD, and the "Installation source" difference was partly due to one of the VMs having an existing installation (which appears to lead to an additional "ISO file" option). I should have been more careful doing the comparison. Sorry for the noise. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
