-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:07:34 -0800 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió: > On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 03:23 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote: > > The install images for 20 Beta RC3 and RC4 are definitely NOT > > identical. The checksums are different, and just looking at the > > DVD, the options under "Installation source" are different (RC3 > > only had one option, RC4 has the regular complement) and the > > add-ons for "Basic desktop" are different (RC3 had Security Lab, > > which normally isn't there, RC4 does not). There are probably other > > differences as well, I didn't check thoroughly. It looks like > > something was broken with RC3 install images and fixed with RC4. > > Sounds like it was affected by the kickstart bug too, then. We didn't > change package loadout at all between RC3 and RC4. only thing different between the two was last nights branched compose for input. pungi, kickstart, etc were all the same. Dennis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSeeG/AAoJEH7ltONmPFDRPHwP/RB2BvxgUIhdEa/VgebrKEua ttbtxm+AhXmDaqODKmJgmWVJkjwRsIRZ18ODccTrbYJeYPo3HxPr2yTHpQMfqAtU hgnYttscgUP0XZ49ZPfFRbkOeswhMaF2AL/kIEgj5ZrZSWZumV9KWvVCSFfbymW8 4R+2tPcBE9HhmypCL4dAMAA7d+3PhOhAnHn02C3VQc2963zw1iYa06tTCTGo9xez h3IAWZREO3d5ALB1Q8prRCiCwexuE8TUAsjbgvjRkUYMtEdPiTEjc5KciNU6vy5p xAOkDyO0cw7JyoCYtF7gvMLyGPZyKsh7lFbupGG6QaBiTB2x0nHeiSH3VXl2CS9n tRZzC9XW2Prj5DSCo4oHyIKsB3SnwGMYpOsUT//VDjtn4z7QcRtn1pjMmrNqiNrb 3AIkZutwuSb8YF1N9GUHASzsoc0+eHLv3ZctSySmtsEvpVVAWHOdNbhzmvATQ7Ne LVsDhflcQxzOSuNJ8qXL646k5YJf/tdGilQvkngBeaezQRlsSwubusy+e09Go9+2 EYSG/CyLYW/RbSm3v8wSPV/bu70Qc8EQ1JBK/7QkubChqJpOB7SsC+13J/NBLEAs Zbty/oqZzjvGBIr/RBezA3GtGhJWP4HFsBDdwuZuLay27Q5DBo+NWPj5btX7gebU Cx1ok+eVJ3VkpvPQezQY =iLND -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
