Re: automatic promotion of freeze exceptions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2013-11-02 at 14:52 +0000, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Do we or should we have a policy of automatically promoting unfixed freeze
> exceptions from Alpha to Beta, or Beta to Final? The concept doesn't make
> sense for blockers, since those have to be fixed at each stage before going
> to the next, but FEs don't.

This comes up every so often, but there isn't an explicit policy either
way. In practice it does not happen because there is no process or
automated mechanism to make it happen.

> On a related note, I've noticed a tendency in blocker meetings to ask
> reporters to repropose bugs as blockers for later stages. I thought it had
> been decided that when reasonable, that should be done immediately when
> blockers are rejected, so they don't fall through the cracks.

When I do secretarialization I tend to go ahead and 'just do it' when
there was a clear agreement at the meeting that it should happen, yeah.
I'd say that should be part of the secretarialization stuff.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux