On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not speaking to any issues of legality or non-legality, but fairly sure he's > referring to the FAT driver in the EFI bios itself, which would have to be > distributed in the EFI bios used by QEMU/KVM for virtual systems. It's not > the linux kernel driver. I understand that distinction but as there is a FAT driver in the linux kernel distributed with Fedora, I don't see why it's suddenly a problem for an EFI virtual firmware that needs a FAT driver to ship with Fedora. Also, Virtualbox includes a UEFI virtual firmware that can read EFI FAT and it's also open source and isn't run afoul of licensing issues insofar as I'm aware. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
