On 05/12/13 05:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 11 May 2013 14:04:28 -0700 > John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I don't know how many people are still using telnet server. I would >>> hope very few. SSH is much more secure and already enabled by >>> default. ;) >> There are local networks that truly are local, providing services >> for the _development_ of small embedded devices (think >> microcontrollers) where telnet (sometimes over a serial line) is the >> largest and slowest program that the device can support while still >> performing its intended function. ssh, scp, web or ftp servers, etc. >> are several times too big and slow. > Sure. Although if they have a serial connection, surely a getty and a > terminal program is even less weight than a telnet server. > > Anyhow, we are drifting off topic. I would expect telnet server to > work, if it doesn't, please file bugs. ;) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962145 This *almost* seems like a re-occurrence of a bug (forget the #) in F18 which ended up being fixed in /bin/login, if memory serves me. If you add "-D options" to the in.telnetd line in telnet@.service the connection is made and you can login. -- The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
