Re: critera proposal/discussion: boot.fedoraproject.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/14/2013 04:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:39:31 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fedora 18 Beta is not present, at least I don't see it. I downloaded
the ISO image and booted inside VM (I wonder why it takes 15 seconds
to display the graphical menu with CPU running at 100%).
It's in the 'prerelease' menu.

By using BFO you download 240 MB (kernel+initrd+squashfs.img),
netinst is 310 MB. So you save something, yes, unless you want to run
it several times.
Indeed.

Do you think we should retire the service?
No, I didn't want to imply that. I'm sure some people will find it
useful. But I have to say it's hard for me to imagine the use cases.
I see just corner cases like machines without an optical drive and
with no USB boot capabilities.


It's totally OK if we create an optional test case for it. That will
ensure it gets some testing throughout the development cycle.
Volunteers, step forward, please :)
Right.

kevin

What benefits does it have using this services as opposed to just use the netinst?

JBG
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux