On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:06:20 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We can create an optional test case for that. > > Do you think this is something we should block our release on (i.e. > creating a release criteria for it)? Nope, I don't think so off hand, I don't think it's critical or popular enough for that. I'd just like to see it tested if possible. > I tried BFO a few times and I've found it heavily outdated every time > (including today) so I wasn't particularly thrilled about it. Outdated in what sense? Not providing tc/rcs? The stable releases are there, the alpha/beta are there in a prerelease menu. > Also, I'm not fully sure who should benefit from it. If you need to > install Fedora, you do it once in a long time, and there's no problem > to download ISO and boot it. If you install Fedora often (e.g. you're > QA), booting from the Internet every time is a no-go, not until it's > as fast as your USB flash drive. Images are smaller than netinstall iso, so I would think you would save some BW (although you do have to download kernel/etc). Do you think we should retire the service? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
