On 12/18/2012 11:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 12/18/2012 08:15 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
OK, so maybe I an nuts but it seems to me that there is this 800
pound gorilla wondering around the Fedora 18 tent and its name is
firewalld! Or it with respect to virtual guests and libvirt (since
libvirt is a critical part of networking support).
Maybe I am missing some critical information as to how to configure
firewalld so that guests can perform functions which the same guest
can do on a Fedora 17 host. She only firewalld configuration I have
been able to come up with is to configure it disabled.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888288
I have test this problem on different hardware and with/without mu
usual updates of libvirt-1.0.1 and NetworkManager-git20121130. Please
tell me that there is just this little thing I need to do and
everything will work.
With Fedora 18 to be released "real soon now", this is a very big
problem! I remember with SELinux first appeared ... most people
disabled it. Is this what is going to happen with firewalld?
A big part of my problem is that I see little notice that there is a
problem.
I do not like cross posting but this needs to be on a couple of lists
so I will be sending each a copy of this message.
Gene
I almost always have to disable selinux to get almost anything out of
the ordinary done.
It would be nice to have the option of not having the selinux slowing
down the system.
I have used SELinux from the beginning and toughed it out a number of
times ... and reported the policy gliches when then happened. I would
like to use firewalld but it is far too good with respect to virtual
guests ... it is not a firewall, it is a brickwall.
Like I said, I hope that it is simply doing "this or that" to make
things work.
gene
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test