On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Having depended on kickstart for years, I'm of the very strong belief > > that while it's okay to have a subset for alpha and beta blockers, > > *all* documented commands should work for final unless they were > > marked as deprecated and gave warnings in a previous release. > > (Preferably two releases, since jumping one release is expected with our > > lifecycle.) > I would prefer this as well, I'm just afraid it's not realistic. We now > have months of delay and still dozens of accepted and proposed final > blockers. If we demand something like that, we might not be able to > release at all. I think that may be the case _now_ with our current Anaconda situation, but the more I think about it, the more strongly I feel about making this the approach for future releases. When there's _not_ a big Anaconda rewrite, kickstart commands shouldn't change drastically without planning. So, I don't think it's unreasonable in the real world. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
