Re: new criterion proposal: core kickstart commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Having depended on kickstart for years, I'm of the very strong belief
> > that while it's okay to have a subset for alpha and beta blockers,
> > *all* documented commands should work for final unless they were
> > marked as deprecated and gave warnings in a previous release.
> > (Preferably two releases, since jumping one release is expected with our
> > lifecycle.)
> I would prefer this as well, I'm just afraid it's not realistic. We now
> have months of delay and still dozens of accepted and proposed final
> blockers. If we demand something like that, we might not be able to
> release at all.

I think that may be the case _now_ with our current Anaconda situation, but
the more I think about it, the more strongly I feel about making this the
approach for future releases. When there's _not_ a big Anaconda rewrite,
kickstart commands shouldn't change drastically without planning. So, I
don't think it's unreasonable in the real world.



-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux