On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 13:17 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 12/04/2012 01:03 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > >> We agreed in principle at the meeting to amend the criterion to cover > >> any critical packaging error. So I propose this wording: > >> > >> There must be no errors in any package on the DVD or release-blocking > >> live desktop media which cause the package to fail to install. Such > >> critical errors include, but are not limited to, undeclared conflicts > >> (explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) and unresolved dependencies > > I'm in favor of this new one. > > As am I Thanks. The inclusion of 'live desktop media' is slightly tricky, I should have unpacked that: it's basically impossible for a package to get onto the live media if it's not installable, as it has to be installed to build the media, but including the phrase gives us a criterion to use when a package is blocking the creation of the live media... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
