| From: Andre Robatino <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | > ===> Which is the real Fedora 18 key? Why isn't this documented better? | | I vaguely remember having this issue early in F18 development. I believe the | verify page initially had the 22B3B81A key but for some reason it had to be | changed. The DE7F38BD key is the current one. There's a bug | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861836 which has never been acted on. Thanks for that reference. It seems to have been acted on today. Coincidence? | > ===> Should we not have a version of sha256 that knows how to deal | > with the gpg signature? | | The FAILED messages for missing files have always been there. I understand it and I think that it is more-or-less reasonable. | The warning about | improperly formatted lines is recent. I filed | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733561 against this bug it was | closed as NOTABUG due to concerns that blocking that warning could cause | security issues. Thanks for that reference too. I've added to that closed bug report. I've added a new script to run gpg and sha256sum in such a way that the user only needs to type one command and the spurious diagnostics are not emitted. I hope something is done because this is perhaps a user's first experience with Fedora. Why make it needlessly complex, confusing, and unpleasant? Heck, even exprienced users don't need the problems. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
