==================================== #fedora-qa: f18beta-blocker-review-9 ==================================== Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-21/f18beta-blocker-review-9.2012-11-21-17.03.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-21/f18beta-blocker-review-9.2012-11-21-17.03.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-qa/2012-11-21/f18beta-blocker-review-9.2012-11-21-17.03.log.html Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 17:03:21) * Introduction (tflink, 17:13:01) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (tflink, 17:13:50) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 17:13:57) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 17:13:57) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 17:14:02) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 17:14:03) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 17:14:09) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 17:14:10) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 17:14:10) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria (tflink, 17:14:10) * Up for review today, there are: (tflink, 17:14:27) * 4 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 17:14:33) * 8 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 17:14:33) * 1 Proposed NTH (tflink, 17:14:33) * 22 Accepted NTH (tflink, 17:14:33) * (878225) unlock of VG w/ multiple encrypted PVs in custom leads to traceback (tflink, 17:15:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878225 (tflink, 17:15:53) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:15:55) * AGREED: 878225 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't clearly hit any of the F18 beta release criterion and seems to be outside the most common paths - this doesn't prevent installs on the machine and thus, rejected as blocker (tflink, 17:24:27) * (875942) KeyError: None (tflink, 17:25:32) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875942 (tflink, 17:25:33) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:25:33) * AGREED: 875942 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't clearly hit any of the F18 beta release criteria and seems to be outside the most common paths - this doesn't prevent installs on affected machines and thus is rejected as a blocker for F18 beta. (tflink, 17:31:02) * (878967) Installation fails when selecting german language (tflink, 17:31:31) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878967 (tflink, 17:31:31) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:31:31) * LINK: http://fpaste.org/UE5w (adamw, 17:34:09) * LINK: http://94.247.144.115/anaconda.png (tflink, 17:36:54) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864622 seems to be a change related to man pages (drago01, 18:09:30) * may be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569392 (tflink, 18:20:59) * LINK: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4713781 (drago01, 18:24:07) * AGREED: 878967 - This could be a blocker but it needs more triage to figure out exactly what's going on and if other languages are affected. Will re-visit once more information is available. (tflink, 18:32:15) * (877871) KeyError: None (tflink, 18:33:58) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877871 (tflink, 18:33:58) * Proposed NTH, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:33:58) * AGREED: 877871 - RejectedNTH - This seems like a rather non-standard use case and avoidable enough to not take a fix past freeze. (tflink, 18:38:31) * (878959) firewall-config can't set permanent rule (tflink, 18:38:40) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878959 (tflink, 18:38:40) * Proposed NTH, firewalld, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:38:41) * AGREED: 878959 - RejectedNTH - This could be fixed with an update and thus, does not need to be pulled in past freeze and does not qualify for NTH status. (tflink, 18:43:15) * (868755) rsync error handling - UEFI and live installs without enough space (tflink, 18:43:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868755 (tflink, 18:43:54) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:43:56) * this has been tested with RC1 and appears to have been fixed (tflink, 18:44:42) * move to VERIFIED (tflink, 18:44:48) * (872047) fedup-dracut builds do not exist in F18 (tflink, 18:45:10) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872047 (tflink, 18:45:10) * Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 18:45:10) * builds exist in updates-testing and were pulled into RC1 (tflink, 18:45:24) * builds need testing and karma (tflink, 18:45:32) * (873459) Upgraded system does not reboot if a kernel upgrade is part of the upgrade (tflink, 18:47:10) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873459 (tflink, 18:47:13) * Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 18:47:16) * this appears to have been fixed from limited testing (tflink, 18:48:30) * it will be moved to VERIFIED if more detailed/varied testing holds up (tflink, 18:48:45) * (876366) New kernel copies its args from the Upgrade System entry (tflink, 18:48:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876366 (tflink, 18:48:57) * Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:48:57) * this appears to have been fixed in limited testing (tflink, 18:49:45) * will move to VERIFIED after a more detailed verification (tflink, 18:49:57) * (876655) Lorax does not support building initramfs for fedup (tflink, 18:50:25) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876655 (tflink, 18:50:25) * Accepted Blocker, lorax, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:50:25) * RC1 does include upgrade.img built by lorax (tflink, 18:50:55) * this has been fixed, moving to VERIFIED (tflink, 18:51:43) * Open Floor (tflink, 18:53:52) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/975 (nirik, 18:54:07) * fesco has not yet decided whether secureboot functionality is a blocker for F18 beta (tflink, 18:54:50) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/975 (tflink, 18:55:00) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/974 also needs input. ;) (nirik, 18:58:14) * fesco is also deciding whether to loosen the "1 week slips only" policy (tflink, 18:59:40) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/974 (tflink, 18:59:51) * input to the decision process would (probably) be appreciated by fesco (tflink, 19:00:18) * The next blocker review meeting (if needed, pending go/no-go decision) will be on 2012-11-28 @ 17:00 UTC (tflink, 19:00:55) Meeting ended at 19:01:47 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (203) * adamw (108) * kparal (54) * drago01 (43) * jreznik (20) * nirik (19) * jreznik_ (11) * akshayvyas (9) * zodbot (5) * robatino (2) * satellit_e (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
