On 10/11/2012 01:33 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I think we'd kinda have to establish that line as we went along, and > maybe refine the criteria further. But do bear in mind this proposal > affects only Beta as things stand. As noted below, the Final criterion > would certainly cover such a configuration, as it's a 'workable > partition layout'. So a failure of LVM-on-soft-RAID should be considered > a final release blocker under the criteria as they stand. The problem I see with the current approach is that (to choose a not-so- random example), LVM-on-RAID can be omitted from the Beta and then "turned on" in the final release with very little testing, which results in bugs like: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750480 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506189 -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx "Sometimes there's nothing left to do but crash and burn, or die trying" ======================================================================== -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
