> > Am I interpreting this correctly to mean that a beta can go out > > without > > support for software RAID and/or LVM, as long as they are not > > offered in > > the Anaconda interface? If so, uugh. > > Well, that's a complex question. =) > > As far as the release criteria would be concerned, yes. My thinking > is > that it's ultimately not exactly QA's decision what filesystem / > device > types anaconda ought to offer, which is sort of what we'd be doing by > specifying particular types in the criteria, and it gets a bit > unwieldy > to specify every type we reckon is important or isn't. > > So in theory, sure, anaconda could drop RAID out of the interface and > the proposed criterion would be satisfied. But that decision could be > challenged _on its own merits_ rather than via the blocker process. I have the same opinion. QA shouldn't dictate technical decisions (e.g. RAID support included or not). Our purpose is to check that offered functionality works correctly. Of course some third-party, like FESCo, can decide that some functionality is essential for Fedora and then it makes sense to include it into release criteria. But it should not be a QA (only) decision. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
