On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:31:41 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The general idea was to increase activity within the QA community and > improve reporting at the same time without having them running around > the whole internet while doings so. Sure, but duplicating upstream work seems not very productive to me. > If the community prefers to run to various upstreams for this info we > can just as well stop reporting to Red Hat's bugzilla and report > directly upstream instead. ( something I have been very much against > in the past for the very same reasons ) Well, in the case of bugs there's give and take and bidirectional communication. In the case of debugging info/steps it's more of a static list. If upstream already produces such a list, shouldn't we just point to that? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
