> It should in fact do both. The fact that it doesn't is a bug. > 'nomodeset' will have the effect of forcing the use of vesa in the > case > of *most* drivers, these days, since they have no UMS code any more. > But > it's really more of a lucky side-effect, and it's not 100%; for > drivers > which do have UMS code, the right thing won't happen. > > It's really the xdriver=vesa that's meant to work, and nomodeset was > added because if you don't stop the KMS drivers from loading, they > will > conflict with the vesa driver. The intent is that nomodeset should be > specified *and* a config file explicitly requesting the vesa driver > (or, > in fact, whatever driver is specified with xdriver=foo) should be > created. > > So we do need to fix the xdriver= function, really. File a bug. Thanks for the reply, I adjusted the test case and reported a new bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858270 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
