On Čt, 2012-09-06 at 10:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On 2012-09-06 0:58, Petr Schindler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think that require LVM and encryption in alpha phase is quite too > > early. It isn't feature which should slow down the alpha release. I > > propose to demand it in beta phase. So I propose to change alpha > > criterion: > > > > 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the > > entire > > disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions methods, with > > or > > without encryption or LVM enabled' > > > > to: > > > > 'The installer must be able to complete an installation using the > > entire > > disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions.' > > > > I think, that these three options are reasonable for alpha. This > > doesn't > > say anything about how to do it, only what should be possible, so it > > could be used with the new anaconda. > > I think that's going in the right direction, though possibly not far > enough. It's worth bearing in mind that the existing criterion is very > tied to the old UI design: "Entire disk", "Existing free space", and > 'Existing Linux partitions" are direct references to the various > autopart methods that oldUI presented, and encryption and LVM are in the > criterion precisely because they were the two checkboxes available on > the oldUI autopart dialog. Basically, the criterion was written to > encapsulate the idea 'all the options on the autopart screen should > work'. > > Given that, it's probably better just to write something entirely from > scratch that's appropriate to newUI rather than trying to tweak the > existing text... OK, what about something like: 'The installer must be able to create a reasonable disk layout using entire disk or enable to create custom layout using basic file systems (ext4, swap)' It's only draft, so I'd like to hear your comments and objections. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test