Adam Williamson <awilliam <at> redhat.com> writes: > I think this is a good idea, yeah. Wording the criterion could be a > little tricky, though - it feels like one of those areas where you have > to be careful and precise about how you encapsulate 'works'. How > important are false negatives? False positives? Etc. Please do post a > draft, though! I think they're both important. It definitely shouldn't PASS on a bad image. And if it FAILs on a good image, then it's useless since people have to be told to avoid mediacheck. So it should PASS if and only if the image is good. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
