On 2012-08-20 10:09, Andre Robatino wrote:
At the moment, there is a Final Criterion that states "If there is an
embedded
checksum on any release medium, it must be correct", which means that
in this
case you can run checkisomd5 externally and have it work. There is
nothing that
ensures that the built-in mediacheck should work, even if it appears
on the boot
menu (which it now does in F18). In fact, at the moment it doesn't -
see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848764 .
So I'd suggest adding something like requiring that if there is an
embedded
checksum, then the built-in mediacheck (corresponding to the
rd.live.check boot
option) should work. Perhaps the embedded checksum should also be
required,
since all the Install and Live images currently have them. Thoughts?
I think this is a good idea, yeah. Wording the criterion could be a
little tricky, though - it feels like one of those areas where you have
to be careful and precise about how you encapsulate 'works'. How
important are false negatives? False positives? Etc. Please do post a
draft, though!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
