-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/27/2012 02:53 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Petr Schindler <pschindl@xxxxxxxxxx> said: >> Because of changes in new anaconda [1] and after short discussion >> with Chris Lumens, I propose to remove this beta criterion [2]: >> >> 'The rescue mode of the installer must be able to detect and >> mount (read-write and read-only) LVM, encrypted, and RAID (BIOS, >> hardware, and software) installations' >> >> Reason (according to Chris): There's been no work done on rescue >> mode and it is highly unlikely that it does anything at all right >> now. > > You've proposed removing rescue mode criteria from both alpha and > beta; is there going to be any requirement for a functional rescue > mode for this release? That's a pretty critical thing to have > completely missing from a release; things that occasionally happen > such as a broken boot loader would render an install virtually > unrecoverable for many users. > Generic rescue images would still work for most problems but I'd tend to agree: a final release with a non-working rescue mode is pretty uncool and seems like a bad precedent. Regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlASpIYACgkQ6YSQoMYUY94txQCfV11gmP5+MICrfHVJhxXXCITD neYAnRkAinUefMy6k6dovhbq4y4h3+8L =NhfS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
