On 07/11/2012 08:30 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 07/11/2012 04:49 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 16:39:28 -0500, >> Kevin Martin <ktmdms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>> Please explain why that makes any difference in this discussion. I'm not sure I see the relevance; vlc want's the 0 version, the >>> others want the 1 version, so what? >> >> To get the .1 version the library needs to be updated, but that would remove the .0 version which is required by vlc. Rather than >> remove vlc, the update is blocked. This also blocks the update of packages to versions that require the .1 version. >> >> Some libraries to provide compatibility versions, but those are special circumstances. > Ah, I see now. I assumed that what I was reading was that systemd-libs was obsoleting *all* of the libudev libraries so I didn't > see what it mattered that both the .0 and .1 versions were being obsoleted. I'll try removing vlc and let you know. > > Thanks. > > Kevin > Aaaaannndddddd, you're correct. Removed vlc and vlc-core and reran the update and the only dependency issues were for kernel related debuginfo packages. Thanks all. Kevin -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
