On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Kevin Martin <ktmdms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/11/2012 11:42 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:12:31 -0500, >>> Kevin Martin <ktmdms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Two questions: >>>> >>>> 1). How do I get rid of the dependency issues shown below? Do I force the >>>> update of systemd-libs or do the packages that are >>>> dependent on libudev need to be updated? >>> >>> >>> I like to keep the latest versions of rawhide packages installed unless it >>> would require removing something really critical. The way I do a quick check >>> for what is blocking updates is to run: >>> yum update -y -v | grep -i fail >>> Note that sometimes early failures cause later failures so that you really >>> don't need to remove every package listed. There can also be failures that >>> don't show up when doing the above. >>> >>> My fallback plan is to remove the packages that won't update. >>> >>> I track all of the packages I remove and regularly try reinstalling them. >>> -- >> Why not just rebuild them in the meantime? I usually simply bump the >> version by one additional "sub-version" (i.e. >> vlc-core-2.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64 -> vlc-core-2.0.1-1.1.fc18.x86_64), >> rebuild with mock, and that's it. >> > The funny thing is that while vlc is *one* of the packages that has libudev dependencies there are a whole bunch more non-rpmfusion > packages that have libudev dependencies as well: > [...] Yeah, but vlc wants libudev.so.0()(64bit), the other ones libudev.so.1()(64bit). -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
