> Well, there's an obvious counterpoint there...*only* half of all people > pick live images to use for installations, despite the fact they're a > smaller and more convenient format. Did you consider the possible > reasons why half of all people continue to choose to download the DVD > (even though it's somewhat tricky to find), and the likelihood that 'I > want to do things like installing multiple desktops' might be one of the > reasons? There's likely several reasons: * Live installs do not allow for the same level of customization as regular installs. For instance, you can't (or at least couldn't?) pick your / filesystem type with a live install. * The netinst is a much smaller download, so for people who are doing a bunch of different types of installs off one media or who are doing a minimal install, this means downloading less stuff up front. * Anyone who is doing an NFS install or HD ISO install is using either an exploded tree or a complete ISO image, neither of which is the live image, and will be downloading it. - Chris -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
