On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson > <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Just bringing this topic to the appropriate mailing list >> >> On the last kernel meeting [1] it was suggested negative karma points should >> be linked to a reported bug which kinda makes sense if you think about it. >> >> What that means is that you ( as in reporter ) will no longer be able to >> provide negative karma without linking it to an already existing bug report >> either created by your or someone else if that came to be. > > Is there such a surplus of people testing things and providing > negative karma that it's acceptable to refuse any that doesn't come > with a bug report? And is the pain of bugless negative karma so great > that it will overcome the cost of an additional mandatory step in the > karma reporting process? IMO it should be optional but recommended. Enforcing it is not a good idea. > Why not start by sending email nags to people who've added negative > karma but who haven't provided a buglink? Well sending nag mails can become annoying resulting into people no longer providing karma. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
