-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/09/2012 01:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 13:31:42 -0400, Tom H <tomh0665@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:19:46 -0400, Tom H <tomh0665@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why do have both "enforcing=0" and "selinux=0"? >>> >>> Because they are different. enforcing=0 will run selinux in permissive >>> mode, selinux=0 will disable selinux. >> >> Exactly. Doesn't disabling selinux for that particular boot not override >> setting selinux to run in permissive mode? It doesn't make sense to use >> both simultaneously. > > If you use selinux=0 it doesn't matter what enforcing is set to. So you > could change things so that there was one flag with three states instead to > two flags with 2 states each. And if we had a way back machine we maybe could do that... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+qsOkACgkQrlYvE4MpobNNQgCeKQvu8JTSi/WNZ7K1CAwrYDxr OB0AnRP2DHzzlzyclEzwVjsFroWNsjyr =aPG/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
