GMA500 vs. G3 software render

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While I consider the latest development on gma500, present in many Atom base netbooks, a great success and would like to say thank you to developer(s), G3 software render negates all this for gnome shell as this is extremely slow on Atom. With the fallback mode the G3 is working very well on gma500. But the obvious question is, beside the questionable future of acceleration on gma500 - what is the future of the fallback? Is there still a list of devices that should use fallback "by default"? If yes, then I would nominate the gma500 for it, as this is really horrible experience, making many users scared, just after live CD/USB boot.

Adam Pribyl
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux