On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:31 +0200, Karel Volný wrote: > Dne St 2. května 2012 23:53:36, Adam Williamson napsal(a): > > GIMP is a professional image editing suite, just like > > Photoshop. It's not a basic touch-up tool. It doesn't really > > make sense to criticise it on the basis that you want to use > > it for something it's not really designed to do. > > and which tool are we supposed to use? Even if the answer were 'there isn't one', that's not GIMP's fault. The GIMP authors want to write a professional photo editor. If no-one wants to write a simple touch-up tool, that's hardly the GIMP authors' fault, is it? > so far, Shotwell and Digikam were proposed > > but these aren't "basic touch-up tools" either: > Shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop > digiKam - A digital camera accessing & photo management > application And we all know summary lines are always kept carefully up to date and fully accurate and contain a complete description of all the app's functionality in their 80 characters or less! (email really needs a :rolleyes: emoticon). It's really not difficult to actually _run_ either app and have a look at what it can do. Shotwell has some pretty basic editing tools - more 'enhancement' than editing - but Digikam has some pretty advanced functionality these days. See http://docs.kde.org/development/en/extragear-graphics/digikam/image-editor.html , for a quick indication of what it can do. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
