On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:55 -0400, george2 wrote: > if one headmaster says the release is inappropriate to use in the > teaching or desktop situation; > > if one religious leader objects to its use in that the supporting > material for the name says "this is your new god" > > if one advocate of equality for women speaks up > > if one government department says its use violates discrimination > in the workplace laws > > if one parent objects > > and it is picked up by the press.... It's a hot dog. It has always been a hot dog. The name is not an innuendo, it is not a double entendre. If anyone thinks it is, that's their problem, not ours. The whole beefy miracle thing is and _has always been_ about a food product. That aside: this list is for QA work. There's no possible basis for QA as a group to object to this or indeed _any_ given release name. If individual QA members believe there's something so terrible about the release name that it's worth trying to provoke a screaming emergency, then by all means, go ahead and do so - but I can't see any basis for doing so as an action _of the QA group_. We're doing QA, we're not debating implications of the release name. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
