On 04/17/2012 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 18:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >> (but why is it *always* broken in Alphas? :-). > > The clue is in the name ;) I disagree. Alphas obviously have bugs, but when the *same* bug (or different bugs with the same symptoms) are present in alpha after alpha (or beta after beta, etc.) then something is broken in the process. -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx "If you're going to shift my paradigm ... at least buy me dinner first." ======================================================================== -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test